Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparisons between low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on quadriceps muscle mass and strength in elderly [with consumer summary]
Vechin FC, Libardi CA, Conceicao MS, Damas FR, Lixandrao ME, Berton RPB, Tricoli VAA, Roschel HA, Cavaglieri CR, Chacon-Mikahil MPT, Ugrinowitsch C
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2015 Apr;29(4):1071-1076
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

High-intensity resistance training (HRT) has been recommended to offset age-related loss in muscle strength and mass. However, part of the elderly population is often unable to exercise at high intensities. Alternatively, low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (LRT-BFR) has emerged. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of LRT-BFR and HRT on quadriceps muscle strength and mass in elderly. Twenty-three elderly individuals, 14 men and 9 women (age 64.04 +/- 3.81 years; weight 72.55 +/- 16.52 kg; height 163 +/- 11 cm), undertook 12 weeks of training. Subjects were ranked according to their pretraining quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) values and then randomly allocated into one of the following groups: (a) control group, (b) HRT: 4x10 repetitions, 70 to 80% one repetition maximum (1RM), and (c) LRT-BFR: 4 sets (1x30 and 3x15 repetitions), 20 to 30% 1RM. The occlusion pressure was set at 50% of maximum tibial arterial pressure and sustained during the whole training session. Leg press 1RM and quadriceps CSA were evaluated at before and after training. A mixed-model analysis was performed, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. Both training regimes were effective in increasing pre- to post-training leg press 1RM (HRT about 54%, p < 0.001; LRT-BFR about 17%, p = 0.067) and quadriceps CSA (HRT 7.9%, p < 0.001; LRT-BFR 6.6%, p < 0.001); however, HRT seems to induce greater strength gains. In summary, LRT-BFR constitutes an important surrogate approach to HRT as an effective training method to induce gains in muscle strength and mass in elderly.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help