Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Randomized controlled trial of the effect of additional functional exercise during slow-stream rehabilitation in a regional center |
| Parker C, Hill K, Cobden J, Davidson M, McBurney H |
| Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2015 May;96(5):831-836 |
| clinical trial |
| 8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether adding functional exercise training to standard physiotherapy during residential slow-stream rehabilitation (SSR) improves discharge outcomes and functional ability. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A regional hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Older people (n = 60) admitted to SSR. INTERVENTION: All participants received standard physiotherapy. An individualized functional incidental training (FIT) program was implemented for intervention participants consisting of 4 extra episodes of functional exercise daily for the period of SSR. Research assistants visited twice weekly to practice and progress FIT programs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included discharge destination, participant-expected discharge destination, and functional tests of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI), and 5 times sit-to-stand test (FTSTS) at admission and discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-two participants completed the study. At baseline, the SSR group achieved higher scores on the BBS, DEMMI, and FTSTS. There was no significant difference in discharge destination between groups (p = 0.305). The difference in functional change between groups from admission to discharge on the BBS, DEMMI, and FTSTS was not significant. Participant-expected discharge destination was significantly associated with eventual discharge destination (Chi2 = 8.40, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Adding FIT to standard physiotherapy did not improve discharge outcomes and did not have a statistically significant effect on function, but may have a small effect on balance. Patient expected and actual discharge destinations were associated.
|