Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Improving motor control in walking: a randomized clinical trial in older adults with subclinical walking difficulty
Brach JS, Lowry K, Perera S, Hornyak V, Wert D, Studenski SA, van Swearingen JM
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2015 Mar;96(3):388-394
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To test the proposed mechanism of action of a task-specific motor learning intervention by examining its effect on measures of the motor control of gait. DESIGN: Single-blinded randomized clinical trial. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n = 40) aged > 65 years with gait speed > 1.0m/s and impaired motor skill (figure-of-8 walk time > 8s). INTERVENTIONS: The 2 interventions included a task-oriented motor learning and a standard exercise program; both interventions included strength training. Both lasted 12 weeks, with twice-weekly, 1-hour, physical therapist-supervised sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two measures of the motor control of gait, gait variability and smoothness of walking, were assessed pre- and postintervention by assessors masked to the treatment arm. RESULTS: Of 40 randomized subjects, 38 completed the trial (mean age +/- SD 77.1 +/- 6.0y). The motor learning group improved more than the standard group in double-support time variability (0.13m/s versus 0.05m/s; adjusted difference (AD) 0.006, p = 0.03). Smoothness of walking in the anteroposterior direction improved more in the motor learning than standard group for all conditions (usual AD = 0.53, p = 0.05; narrow AD = 0.56, p = 0.01; dual task AD = 0.57, p = 0.04). Smoothness of walking in the vertical direction also improved more in the motor learning than standard group for the narrow-path (AD = 0.71, p = 0.01) and dual-task (AD = 0.89, p = 0.01) conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults with subclinical walking difficulty, there is initial evidence that task-oriented motor learning exercise results in gains in the motor control of walking, while standard exercise does not. Task-oriented motor learning exercise is a promising intervention for improving timing and coordination deficits related to mobility difficulties in older adults, and needs to be evaluated in a definitive larger trial.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help