Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
|Risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians [with consumer summary]|
|Qaseem A, Mir TP, Starkey M, Denberg TD, Clinical Guidelines Committee [American College of Physicians]|
|Annals of Internal Medicine 2015 Mar 3;162(5):359-369|
DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations based on the comparative effectiveness of risk assessment scales and preventive interventions for pressure ulcers. METHODS: This guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using Medline (1946 through February 2014), CINAHL (1998 through February 2014), the Cochrane Library, clinical trials registries, and reference lists. Searches were limited to English-language publications. The outcomes evaluated for this guideline include pressure ulcer incidence and severity, resource use, diagnostic accuracy, measures of risk, and harms. This guideline grades the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations by using ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. The target audience for this guideline includes all clinicians, and the target patient population is patients at risk for pressure ulcers. RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP recommends that clinicians should perform a risk assessment to identify patients who are at risk of developing pressure ulcers (grade: weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP recommends that clinicians should choose advanced static mattresses or advanced static overlays in patients who are at an increased risk of developing pressure ulcers (grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 3: ACP recommends against using alternating-air mattresses or alternating-air overlays in patients who are at an increased risk of developing pressure ulcers (grade: weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
Additional document(s) available for this guideline: