STUDY DESIGN: This is an open randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of a 16-week hybrid cycle versus handcycle exercise program on fitness and physical activity in inactive people with long-term spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: The study was conducted in two rehabilitation centers with a specialized SCI unit. METHODS: Twenty individuals (SC I8 years) were randomly assigned to a hybrid cycle (voluntary arm exercise combined with functional electrical stimulation (FES)-induced leg exercise) or a handcycle group. During 16 weeks, both groups trained twice a week for 30 min at 65 to 75% heart rate reserve. Outcome measures obtained before, during and after the program were fitness (peak power output, peak oxygen consumption), submaximal VO2 and heart rate (HR), resting HR, wheelchair skill performance time score) and physical activity (distance travelled in wheelchair and Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) score). Changes were examined using a two-factor mixed-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: For all fitness parameters, except for submaximal VO2, no interaction effects were found. The hybrid cycle group showed a decrease in VO2 over time in contrast to the handcycle group (p = 0.045). An overall reduction in HRrest (5 +/- 2 bpm; p = 0.03) and overall increase in PASIPD score (6.5 +/- 2.1; p = 0.002) were found after 16 weeks of training. No overall training effects were found for the other fitness and activity outcome measures. CONCLUSION: In the current study, hybrid cycling and handcycling showed similar effects on fitness and physical activity, indicating that there seem to be no additional benefits of the FES-induced leg exercise over handcycle training alone.
Reprinted by permission from Spinal Cord, Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher