Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

A self-managed single exercise programme versus usual physiotherapy treatment for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomised controlled trial (the SELF study) [with consumer summary]
Littlewood C, Bateman M, Brown K, Bury J, Mawson S, May S, Walters SJ
Clinical Rehabilitation 2016 Jul;30(7):686-696
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a self-managed single exercise programme versus usual physiotherapy treatment for rotator cuff tendinopathy. DESIGN: Multi-centre pragmatic unblinded parallel group randomised controlled trial. SETTING: UK National Health Service. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of rotator cuff tendinopathy. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention was a programme of self-managed exercise prescribed by a physiotherapist in relation to the most symptomatic shoulder movement. The control group received usual physiotherapy treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) at three months. Secondary outcomes included the SPADI at six and twelve months. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients (self-managed loaded exercise n = 42; usual physiotherapy n = 44) were randomised. Twenty-six patients were excluded from the analysis because of lack of primary outcome data at the 3 months follow-up, leaving 60 (n = 27; n = 33) patients for intention to treat analysis. For the primary outcome, the mean SPADI score at three months was 32.4 (SD 20.2) for the self-managed group, and 30.7 (SD 19.7) for the usual physiotherapy treatment group; mean difference adjusted for baseline score: 3.2 (95% confidence interval -6.0 to +12.4 p = 0.49). By six and twelve months there remained no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide sufficient evidence of superiority of one intervention over the other in the short-, mid- or long-term and hence a self-management programme based around a single exercise appears comparable to usual physiotherapy treatment.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help