Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparison of lung expansion techniques on thoracoabdominal mechanics and incidence of pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized and controlled trial
Lunardi AC, Paisani DM, Marques da Silva CCB, Cano DP, Tanaka C, Carvalho CRF
Chest 2015 Oct 1;148(4):1003-1010
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of LET on pulmonary volumes, respiratory muscle activation and PPC incidence after major elective upper abdominal surgery. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 137 patients, who were randomly assigned into 4 groups: control (CG; n = 35), flow incentive spirometry (FIS; n = 33), deep breathing (DB; n = 35) and volume incentive spirometry (VIS; n = 34). Each intervention was performed 3 times per day during 5 days. Subsequently, PPC (pneumonia, atelectasis or severe hypoxemia) were analyzed by a blinded assessor until hospital discharge. Lung volumes (optoelectronic plethysmography) and inspiratory muscular activation (surface electromyography) were assessed before and 3 days after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed considering the intention to treat analysis. RESULTS: Before surgery, all groups were homogenous for age, gender, BMI, lung function and thoracoabdominal mechanics. After surgery, no difference was observed in the lung volumes and inspiratory muscular activation during the lung expansion technique (p > 0.05). The PPC incidence was higher in the DB group (p < 0.05). Higher ASA scores and surgery duration were the only predictors of PPC (n = 14, 11.2%). CONCLUSION: LET do not modify the changes on thoracoabdominal mechanics or prevent PPC after abdominal surgery. The indiscriminate use of LET should not be routinely prescribed to prevent PPC; however, more studies are required to confirm our results and to change the standard practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01993602.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help