Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Rehabilitation following first-time patellar dislocation: a randomised controlled trial of purported vastus medialis obliquus muscle versus general quadriceps strengthening exercises |
Smith TO, Chester R, Cross J, Hunt N, Clark A, Donell ST |
The Knee 2015 Sep;22(4):313-320 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: We aimed to define whether distal vastus medialis (VM) muscle strengthening improves functional outcomes compared to general quadriceps muscle strengthening following first-time patellar dislocation (FTPD). METHODS: Fifty patients post-FTPD were randomised to either a general quadriceps exercise or rehabilitation programme (n = 25) or a specific-VM exercise and rehabilitation regime (n = 25). The primary outcome was the Lysholm knee score, and secondary outcomes included the Tegner Level of Activity score, the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score, and isometric knee extension strength at various knee flexion ranges of motion. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, six weeks, six months and 12 months. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in functional outcome and activity levels with the Lysholm knee score and Tegner Level of Activity score at 12 months in the general quadriceps exercise group compared to the VM group (p = 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.0 to 0.0; p = 0.04; 95% CI -3.0 to 0.0). This did not reach a clinically important difference. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the NPI score and isometric strength at any follow-up interval. The trial experienced substantial participant attrition (52% at 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst there was a statistical difference in the Lysholm knee score and Tegner Level of Activity score between general quadriceps and VM exercise groups at 12 months, this may not have necessarily been clinically important. This trial highlights that participant recruitment and retention are challenges which should be considered when designing future trials in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level I.
|