Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Delayed onset muscle soreness: lack of effect of therapeutic ultrasound in humans |
Craig JA, Bradley J, Walsh DM, Baxter GD, Allen JM |
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999 Mar;80(3):318-323 |
clinical trial |
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of two dosages of pulsed ultrasound therapy (1 MHz, spatial averaged peak intensity 0.8 W/cm2, mark space ratio of 1:4) on acute-stage delayed onset muscle soreness (DAMS). DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. SETTING: Laboratory of a university physiotherapy department. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight healthy volunteers (24 men, 24 women) with no arm pathology or pain at the time of the study. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups: control, placebo (sham insonation), low-dosage pulsed ultrasound (mean dosage 172.8 J), or high-dosage pulsed ultrasound (mean dosage 345.6 J). DOMS was induced in the nondominant elbow flexors in a standardized fashion through repeated eccentric exercise until exhaustion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Elbow extension, flexion, and resting angles (universal goniometer), pain (visual analogue scale), mechanical pain threshold/tenderness (pressure algometer), and a McGill pain questionnaire. Measurements were taken before and after treatment each day except for the McGill pain questionnaire, which was completed at the end of the trial. RESULTS: Significant differences were seen between groups in relation to range of flexion (p = 0.0032), with the control group losing least range of flexion. There were no other significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: No convincing evidence was found to support the use of pulsed ultrasound therapy in the management of DOMS at the parameters discussed here.
|