Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Delayed onset muscle soreness: lack of effect of therapeutic ultrasound in humans
Craig JA, Bradley J, Walsh DM, Baxter GD, Allen JM
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999 Mar;80(3):318-323
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of two dosages of pulsed ultrasound therapy (1 MHz, spatial averaged peak intensity 0.8 W/cm2, mark space ratio of 1:4) on acute-stage delayed onset muscle soreness (DAMS). DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. SETTING: Laboratory of a university physiotherapy department. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight healthy volunteers (24 men, 24 women) with no arm pathology or pain at the time of the study. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups: control, placebo (sham insonation), low-dosage pulsed ultrasound (mean dosage 172.8 J), or high-dosage pulsed ultrasound (mean dosage 345.6 J). DOMS was induced in the nondominant elbow flexors in a standardized fashion through repeated eccentric exercise until exhaustion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Elbow extension, flexion, and resting angles (universal goniometer), pain (visual analogue scale), mechanical pain threshold/tenderness (pressure algometer), and a McGill pain questionnaire. Measurements were taken before and after treatment each day except for the McGill pain questionnaire, which was completed at the end of the trial. RESULTS: Significant differences were seen between groups in relation to range of flexion (p = 0.0032), with the control group losing least range of flexion. There were no other significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: No convincing evidence was found to support the use of pulsed ultrasound therapy in the management of DOMS at the parameters discussed here.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help