Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Predictors of the physical impact of multiple sclerosis following community-based, exercise trial
Kehoe M, Saunders J, Jakeman P, Coote S
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 2015 Apr;21(5):590-598
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating exercise interventions in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) demonstrate small to medium positive effects and large variability on a number of outcome measures. No study to date has tried to explain this variability. OBJECTIVE: This paper presents a novel exploration of data examining the predictors of outcome for PwMS with minimal gait impairment following a randomised, controlled trial evaluating community-based exercise interventions (n = 242). METHODS: The primary variable was the physical component of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29, version 2 (MSIS-29, v2) after a 10-week, controlled intervention period. Predictors were identified a priori and were measured at baseline. Multiple linear regression was conducted. RESULTS: Four models are presented lower MSIS-29, v2 scores after the intervention period were best predicted by a lower baseline MSIS-29, v2, a lower baseline Modified Fatigue Impact Score (physical subscale), randomisation to an exercise intervention, a longer baseline walking distance measured by the Six Minute Walk Test and female gender. This model explained 57.4% of the variance (F[5,211] = 59.24, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that fatigue and walking distance at baseline contribute significantly to predicting MSIS-29, v2 (physical component) after intervention, and thus should be the focus of intervention and assessment. Exercise is an important contributor to minimising the physical impact of MS, and gender-specific interventions may be warranted.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help