Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Clinical response and relapse in patients with chronic low back pain following osteopathic manual treatment: results from the OSTEOPATHIC Trial |
| Licciardone JC, Aryal S |
| Manual Therapy 2014 Dec;19(6):541-548 |
| clinical trial |
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
Clinical response and relapse following a regimen of osteopathic manual treatment (OMT) were assessed in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) within the OSTEOPATHIC trial, a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Initial clinical response and subsequent stability of response, including final response and relapse status at week 12, were determined in 186 patients with high baseline pain severity (>= 50 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale). Substantial improvement in LBP, defined as 50% or greater pain reduction relative to baseline, was used to assess clinical response at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12. Sixty-two (65%) patients in the OMT group attained an initial clinical response versus 41 (45%) patients in the sham OMT group (risk ratio (RR) 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11 to 1.90). The median time to initial clinical response to OMT in these patients was 4 weeks. Among patients with an initial clinical response prior to week 12, 13 (24%) patients in the OMT group versus 18 (51%) patients in the sham OMT group relapsed (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.83). Overall, 49 (52%) patients in the OMT group attained or maintained a clinical response at week 12 versus 23 (25%) patients in the sham OMT group (RR 2.04; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.05). The large effect size for short-term efficacy of OMT was driven by stable responders who did not relapse.
|