Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of the Danish return-to-work program on long-term sickness absence: results from a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities
Poulsen OM, Aust B, Bjorner JB, Rugulies R, Hansen JV, Tverborgvik T, Winzor G, Mortensen OS, Helverskov T, Orbaek P, Nielsen MBD
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 2014 Jan;40(1):47-56
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Danish return-to-work (RTW) program on long-term sickness absence in a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities. METHODS: The intervention group comprised 1,948 participants while the control group comprised 1,157 participant receiving ordinary sickness benefit management (OSM). Study participants were working-age adults receiving long-term (>= 8 weeks or more) benefits, included regardless of reason for sickness absence or employment status. Each beneficiary was followed-up for a maximum period of 52 weeks. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for return to work (RTW) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: The intervention effect differed significantly between the municipalities (p = 0.00005). In one municipality (M2) the intervention resulted in a statistically significant increased rate of recovery from long-term sickness absence (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.74). In the other two municipalities, the intervention did not show a statistically significant effect (HR M1 1.12, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.29, and HR M3 0.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.03, respectively). Adjustment for a series of possible confounders only marginally altered the estimated HR. CONCLUSION: The effect of the intervention differed substantially between the three municipalities, indicating that that contextual factors are of major importance for success or failure of this complex intervention.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help