Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effect of the Danish return-to-work program on long-term sickness absence: results from a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities |
Poulsen OM, Aust B, Bjorner JB, Rugulies R, Hansen JV, Tverborgvik T, Winzor G, Mortensen OS, Helverskov T, Orbaek P, Nielsen MBD |
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 2014 Jan;40(1):47-56 |
clinical trial |
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Danish return-to-work (RTW) program on long-term sickness absence in a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities. METHODS: The intervention group comprised 1,948 participants while the control group comprised 1,157 participant receiving ordinary sickness benefit management (OSM). Study participants were working-age adults receiving long-term (>= 8 weeks or more) benefits, included regardless of reason for sickness absence or employment status. Each beneficiary was followed-up for a maximum period of 52 weeks. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for return to work (RTW) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: The intervention effect differed significantly between the municipalities (p = 0.00005). In one municipality (M2) the intervention resulted in a statistically significant increased rate of recovery from long-term sickness absence (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.74). In the other two municipalities, the intervention did not show a statistically significant effect (HR M1 1.12, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.29, and HR M3 0.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.03, respectively). Adjustment for a series of possible confounders only marginally altered the estimated HR. CONCLUSION: The effect of the intervention differed substantially between the three municipalities, indicating that that contextual factors are of major importance for success or failure of this complex intervention.
|