Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Basic body awareness therapy or exercise therapy for the treatment of chronic whiplash associated disorders: a randomized comparative clinical trial [with consumer summary] |
Seferiadis A, Ohlin P, Billhult A, Gunnarsson R |
Disability and Rehabilitation 2016;38(5):442-451 |
clinical trial |
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
PURPOSE: Chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) incur both costs and suffering. Treatments that can relieve chronic WAD are therefore needed. Exercise therapy (ET) has been shown to provide pain relief. Another often used treatment for chronic pain in Scandinavia is basic body awareness therapy (BAT). We compared the effectiveness of 10 weeks of twice-weekly, 90-min sessions of either ET or BAT in a randomized comparative trial. METHOD: We recruited 113 patients suffering from chronic WAD grades I to III and several years' duration of symptoms in a primary health care setting. 57 were allocated to ET and 56 to BAT. Primary outcome measures were Neck Disability Index and SF-36 v2. RESULTS: From baseline to post-treatment, the BAT group increased their physical functioning (median 5, IQR 15) more than the ET group (median 0, IQR 15), p = 0.032, effect size -0.54. Three months after the end of treatment, the BAT group had less bodily pain (m 17.5, 95% CI 6.9 to 17.6) than the ET group (m 4.9, 95% CI -0.1 to 9.8), p = 0.044, effect size -0.4. The BAT group had also increased their social functioning (m 13.3, 95% CI 6.6 to 19.9) more than the ET group (m 3.5, 95% CI -3 to 9.9), p = 0.037, effect size -0.41. No statistically significant differences between groups were found for the change of other outcomes. No serious adverse effects were found in either groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present trial indicates that BAT led to greater improvements than ET for the patients with chronic WAD.
|