Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Electroacupuncture with different current intensities to treat knee osteoarthritis: a single-blinded controlled study
Ju Z, Guo X, Jiang X, Wang X, Liu S, He J, Cui H, Wang K
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2015;8(10):18981-18989
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) stimulation with high-intensity compared with low-intensity on knee osteoarthritis (KOA). METHODS: Participants with KOA were randomized to either high-intensity EA group or low-intensity EA group. EA was applied unilaterally on the affected leg with the local points GB34, ST34, EX-LE4, EX-LE5, ST36, and SP9. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were measured before and after participation. Plasma TNFalpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, and apelin levels were also assessed by enzyme immunoassay (ELA) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Of 80 participants who consented to study participation, 77 completed the program. The patients showed a significant improvement in their pain, stiffness, and physical function on the VAS and WOMAC, accompanying with a significantly reduction in plasma levels of apelin and TNFalpha. Furthermore, high-intensity group exhibited statistically significant improvements in stiffness and physical function symptoms compared with low-intensity group. Plasma level of IL-6 was significantly decreased only after high-intensity EA treatment. Furthermore, apelin level was significantly inhibited in high-intensity EA group than in low-intensity EA group. CONCLUSIONS: Both high- and low-intensity EA treatments alleviate the clinical symptoms of KOA patients. High-intensity EA is more effective than low-intensity EA. Changes in plasma levels of TNFalpha, apelin and IL-6 may be involved in the therapeutic effect of EA on KOA.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help