Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Cost-effectiveness of a one-year coaching program for healthy physical activity in early rheumatoid arthritis [with consumer summary]
Brodin N, Lohela-Karlsson M, Swardh E, Opava CH
Disability and Rehabilitation 2015;37(9):757-762
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: To describe cost-effectiveness of the Physical Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis (PARA) study intervention. METHOD: Costs were collected and estimated retrospectively. Cost-effectiveness was calculated based on the intervention cost per patient with respect to change in health status (EuroQol global visual analog scale -- EQ-VAS and EuroQol -- EQ-5D) and activity limitation (Health assessment questionnaire -HAQ) using cost-effectiveness- and cost-minimization analyses. RESULTS: Total cost of the one-year intervention program was estimated to be Euro 67,317 or Euro 716 per participant. Estimated difference in total societal cost between the intervention (IG) and control (CG) was Euro 580 per participant. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for one point (1/100) of improvement in EQ-VAS was estimated to be Euro 116. By offering the intervention to more affected participants in the IG compared to less affected participants, 15.5 extra points of improvement in EQ-VAS and 0.13 points of improvement on HAQ were gained at the same cost. "Ordinary physiotherapy" was most cost-effective with regard to EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention resulted in improved effect in health status for the IG with a cost of Euro 116 per extra point in VAS. The intervention was cost-effective if targeted towards a subgroup of more affected patients when evaluating the effect using VAS and HAQ.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help