Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Randomized controlled pilot of an intervention to reduce and break-up overweight/obese adults' overall sitting-time
Judice PB, Hamilton MT, Sardinha LB, Silva AM
Trials 2015 Nov 2;16(490):Epub
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Too much prolonged sitting is a prevalent health risk among adults. Interventions have focused mainly on the workplace, with limited attention to non-work settings. The effectiveness of a short-term intervention to reduce and break-up sitting-time in overweight/obese adults was examined. This pilot study sought to determine the feasibility of interrupting sitting to stand/ambulate objectively with ActivPAL devices which provide a valid measurement of sit/stand transitions. METHODS: This is a cross-over randomized controlled pilot that included 10 participants (aged 37 to 65 years) and although a small and short-term intervention (1-week intervention; no washout) further informs on the feasibility of interventions on a larger scale. At the workplace, screen-delivered hourly alerts prompted participants to break-up sitting-time through adopting walking behaviors (approximately 30 to 60 minutes/day). During transportation/home/leisure-time individual goals for steps/day were set and sitting-reduction strategies (including behavioral self-monitoring) were delivered through daily text messages. Change in inclinometer-derived sitting-time is the main outcome. Standing, stepping, number of sit/stand transitions and participant satisfaction were also examined. RESULTS: For the intervention compared to the control-week (mean difference (95% confidence interval); p value), participants had less sitting-time (1.85 hours (0.96 to 2.75); p = 0.001), more standing (0.77 hours (0.06 to 1.48); p = 0.036), and more stepping (1.09 hours (0.79 to 1.38); p < 0.001). Importantly, there was no change in the total number of sit/stand transitions (3.28 (-2.33 to 8.89); p = 0.218) despite successfully reducing sitting-time and increasing time spent standing and walking. CONCLUSIONS: Sitting-time in overweight/obese adults can be reduced following a brief multi-component intervention based on prompts, telephone support, goal setting and behavioral self-monitoring. However, the results from this pilot study provide new insight that when overweight/obese adults attempted to reduce sedentary-time by walking and standing for approximately 2 hours/day more than usual, they did not actually get up from sitting more often (ie, increasing the number of sit/stand transitions), but instead remained on their feet for longer during each non-sitting bout. This behavioral resistance to make more sit/stand transitions (ie, get-up from sitting more often) may have important implications for future modification programs and supports the concept that when overweight/obese people are sitting, people seem to prefer not to interrupt the sedentary behavior to get-up from sitting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 26 November 2013, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02007681 (first participant was randomized on 2 September 2013).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help