Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Evaluation of the PEP mask in cystic fibrosis
Steen HJ, Redmond AO, O'Neill D, Beattie F
Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 1991 Jan;80(1):51-56
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Twenty-eight patients suffering from cystic fibrosis, with an age range of 8 to 21 years entered a randomised cross-over trial to study the efficacy of the Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) mask as a method of chest physiotherapy, both on its own and in conjunction with other physiotherapy techniques. Twenty-four of these patients completed the trial consisting of 4 treatment programmes each lasting one month and with no wash-out period between them. Five of these patients went on to a fifth programme of Forced Expiratory Technique (FET) alone. At the end of the trial, no significant difference was found between the programmes as regards growth, Shwachman score, Chrispin-Norman score or pulmonary function tests. Twenty-three patients chose to continue using the PEP mask in conjunction with FET long-term as their chest physiotherapy programme as they felt it was an effective treatment allowing increased independence, with postural drainage being kept to a minimum.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help