Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| What is the effect of regular group exercise on maternal psychological outcomes and common pregnancy complaints? An assessor blinded RCT | 
| Haakstad LAH, Torset B, Bo K | 
| Midwifery 2016 Jan;32:81-86 | 
| clinical trial | 
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* | 
| 
                     OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of supervised group exercise on maternal psychological outcomes and commonly reported pregnancy complaints. DESIGN: An observer-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 105 sedentary, nulliparous pregnant women, mean age 30.7 (+/- 4.0) years, pre-pregnancy BMI 23.8 (+/- 4.3), were assigned to either exercise (n = 52) or control group (n = 53) at mean gestation week 17.7 (+/- 4.2). INTERVENTION: The exercise intervention followed ACOG guidelines and included a 60 minutes general fitness class, with 40 minutes of endurance training/aerobic and 20 minutes of strength training and stretching/relaxation, performed at least twice per week for a minimum of 12 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Outcome measures were assessed through standardized interviews pre- and post-intervention (gestation week 36.6 +/- 0.9), and included psychological variables related to quality of life, well-being, body image and pregnancy depression, as well as assessment of 13 commonly reported pregnancy complaints. FINDINGS: Post-intervention, using intention to treat (ITT) analysis, women randomized to exercise rated their health significantly better compared to women in the control group (p = 0.02) and reported less fatigue related to everyday activities (p = 0.04). Women with complete exercise adherence (> 24 sessions) had significantly better scores on measurements of feelings related to sadness, hopelessness and anxiety (p < 0.01), compared to the control group. Contradictory, the control group reported higher life enjoyment (p < 0.01). There were no significant group differences in body-image or pregnancy depression. With respect to analysing pregnancy complaints according to ITT, no differences between the groups were found. A comparison of the women who attended > 19 (80%, n = 21) or > 24 (100%, n = 14) exercise sessions with the control-participants, showed that fewer women in the exercise group reported nausea/vomiting and numbness/poor circulation in legs. KEY CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTISE: Participation in regular group exercise during pregnancy contributed to improvements in some variables related to maternal well-being and quality of life. Women with high exercise adherence had significantly better results on several health variables reaping the highest benefits. A qualitative study exploring the barriers of women in achieving recommended amount of activity may be necessary to understand this population and developing better clinical practice educational tools.  
  |