Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Does adding cognitive-behavioural physiotherapy to exercise improve outcome in patients with chronic neck pain? A randomised controlled trial
Thompson DP, Oldham JA, Woby SR
Physiotherapy 2016 Jun;102(2):170-177
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether adding a physiotherapist-led cognitive-behavioural intervention to an exercise programme improved outcome in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP). DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Four outpatient physiotherapy departments. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven patients with CNP. Follow-up data were provided by 39 participants (57% of the progressive neck exercise programme (PNEP) group and 79% of the interactive behavioural modification therapy (IBMT) group). INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-eight subjects were randomised to the PNEP group and 29 subjects were randomised to the IBMT group. IBMT is underpinned by cognitive-behavioural principles, and aims to modify cognitive risk factors through interactive educational sessions, graded exercise and progressive goal setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was disability, measured by the Northwick Park Questionnaire (NPQ). Secondary outcomes were the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Pain Catastrophising Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale (CPSS) and the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire. RESULTS: No significant between-group differences in disability were observed (mean NPQ change PNEp -7.2, IBMT -10.2). However, larger increases in functional self-efficacy (mean CPSS change PNEp 1.0, IBMT 3.2) and greater reductions in pain intensity (mean NPRS change PNEp -1.0, IBMT -2.2; p < 0.05) and pain-related fear (mean TSK change PNEp 0.2, IBMT -4.7, p < 0.05) were observed with IBMT. Additionally, a significantly greater proportion of participants made clinically meaningful reductions in pain (25% versus 55%, p < 0.05) and disability (25% versus 59%, p < 0.05) with IBMT. CONCLUSIONS: The primary outcome did not support the use of cognitive-behavioural physiotherapy in all patients with CNP. However, superior outcomes were observed for several secondary measures, and IBMT may offer additional benefit in some patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN27611394.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help