Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Health outcomes of two telephone interventions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis
Maisiak R, Austin J, Heck L
Arthritis and Rheumatism 1996 Aug;39(8):1391-1399
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The effects of treatment counseling or symptom monitoring telephone intervention strategies on the health outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA), compared with usual care, were assessed. METHODS: A 3-group, randomized, controlled 9-month trial was conducted incorporating 405 patients with RA or OA and using the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS2) as the outcome measure. RESULTS: Analyses of covariance showed that the AIMS2 total health status of the treatment counseling group (effect size = 33, p < 0.01), but not the symptom monitoring group (effect size = 0.21, p = 0.10), was significantly improved, compared with usual care, for both RA and OA patients. The specific types of benefits differed significantly between RA and OA patients. The mean number of medical visits by OA patients in the treatment counseling group was also significantly reduced (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Telephone contact using the treatment counseling strategy produced significant, but different, health status benefits for RA and OA patients. The symptom monitoring strategy produced modest benefits.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.lww.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help