Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effectiveness of lifestyle counseling by certified expert nurse of Japan for non-insulin-treated diabetic outpatients: a 1-year randomized controlled trial |
Shibayama T, Kobayashi K, Takano A, Kadowaki T, Kazuma K |
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2007 May;76(2):265-268 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
We examine whether one-to-one lifestyle counseling for non-insulin-treated diabetic outpatients by a certified expert nurse (CEN) can improve patients' health outcomes. Participants were randomly assigned to a 1-year lifestyle intervention (n = 67) or to a usual care group (n = 67). Main outcome measures were changes from baseline in: HbA1C and score of health related quality of life scales (SF-36 and Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale). Cognitive/behavioral modification for 1 year and satisfaction in CEN counseling was also measured by self-produced items. We found no significant differences in HbA1C, BMI, blood pressure, serum lipids, or health related quality of life over 1 year between the two groups. Patients in the intervention group, however, showed modest but more favorable modification of cognition (p = 0.004) and behavior (p < 0.001) than subjects in usual care group. The low attrition rate (9%), more frequent hospital visit (12 +/- 2 times versus 11 +/- 3 times; p = 0.03) and high degree of satisfaction (95%) in the intervention group indicate feasibility of the monthly CEN counseling in the outpatient settings of Japanese hospitals. Future research should confirm the long-term effectiveness of the CEN counseling on clinical outcomes and the cost effectiveness of a possibly time-consuming intervention.
|