Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Wobble board rehabilitation for improving balance in ankles with chronic instability
Linens SW, Ross SE, Arnold BL
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 2016 Jan;26(1):76-82
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To quantify improvements in clinical impairments using a wobble board rehabilitation protocol for chronic ankle instability (CAI). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS: Thirty-four participants with "giving way" and history of ankle sprains were randomly assigned to a rehabilitation group (REH) (170.22 +/- 8.71 cm; 75.57 +/- 13.55 kg; 22.94 +/- 2.77 years) or control group (CON) (168.57 +/- 9.81 cm; 77.19 +/- 19.93 kg; 23.18 +/- 3.64 years). INTERVENTIONS: Four weeks with no intervention for CON or wobble board rehabilitation for REH, consisting of 3 sessions per week of 5 repetitions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dependent variables were preintervention and postintervention score on foot lift test (average number of errors), Time-in-Balance Test (TBT) (longest time), Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT)-anteromedial, medial, and posteromedial (average reach distance normalized to leg length), side hop test (fastest time), and figure-of-eight hop test (fastest time). RESULTS: Main effects for time were significant for all measures (p < 0.05); but main effects for groups were not (p > 0.05) except for SEBT-anteromedial reach direction. Significant interactions were found for all dependent measures (p < 0.05) except for TBT (p > 0.05). Post hoc testing of significant interactions showed REH improved performance at posttest, whereas CON did not. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that a single intervention using a wobble board improved static and dynamic balance deficits associated with CAI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This approach provides a potentially more economical, time efficient, and space efficient means of improving clinical outcome measures associated with CAI in patients who are physically active.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.lww.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help