Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Does treatment by a specialist physiotherapist change pain and function in young adults with symptoms from femoroacetabular impingement? A pilot project for a randomised controlled trial |
Smeatham A, Powell R, Moore S, Chauhan R, Wilson M |
Physiotherapy 2017 Jun;103(2):201-207 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
AIM: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is recognised as a source of hip pain but the effect of conservative treatment remains untested. This pilot study aimed to inform and evaluate the methods required to conduct a substantive trial comparing the effect of treatment by a physiotherapist versus routine care on the symptoms of FAI. DESIGN: A parallel group, pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: A single NHS acute hospital trust, Devon, England. PARTICIPANTS: 30 adults with symptomatic FAI were recruited. 23 (77%) completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention was 3 months of treatment by a specialist physiotherapist. The control group received routine care. MAIN OUTCOMES: Change in pain and function was measured using a visual analogue scale, Non Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS) and Hip Outcome Score. RESULTS: Participants in the intervention arm undertook a personalised exercise programme to improve pelvic and femoral control plus advice on posture, activity pacing and pain relief. The mean change in NAHS for the intervention group was 12.7 (95% CI 4.7 to 20.7) and 1.8 (95% CI -5.3 to 9.0) in the control group; Median change in LEFS was 11.5 (95% CI 5.0 to 26.0) versus -1.0 (95% CI -7.0 to 4.0). This improvement in LEFS was beyond minimal clinically important difference in the intervention group. Pain scores improved marginally in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological strengths and weaknesses were successfully identified for a substantive study. Further research is needed to evaluate the relative influence of structural and neuromuscular features on symptoms of FAI and the role of conservative treatment.
|