Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Activity monitor intervention to promote physical activity of physicians-in-training: randomized controlled trial
Thorndike AN, Mills S, Sonnenberg L, Palakshappa D, Gao T, Pau CT, Regan S
PLoS ONE 2014 Jun;9(6):e100251
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Physicians are expected to serve as role models for healthy lifestyles, but long work hours reduce time for healthy behaviors. A hospital-based physical activity intervention could improve physician health and increase counseling about exercise. METHODS: We conducted a two-phase intervention among 104 medical residents at a large hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Phase 1 was a 6-week randomized controlled trial comparing daily steps of residents assigned to an activity monitor displaying feedback about steps and energy consumed (intervention) or to a blinded monitor (control). Phase 2 immediately followed and was a 6-week non-randomized team steps competition in which all participants wore monitors with feedback. Phase 1 outcomes were: (1) median steps/day and (2) proportion of days activity monitor worn. The phase 2 outcome was mean steps/day on days monitor worn (> 500 steps/day). Physiologic measurements were collected at baseline and study end. Median steps/day were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Mean steps were compared using repeated measures regression analyses. RESULTS: In phase 1, intervention and control groups had similar activity (6,369 versus 6,063 steps/day, p = 0.16) and compliance with wearing the monitor (77% versus 77% of days, p = 0.73). In phase 2 (team competition), residents recorded more steps/day than during phase 1 (control 7,971 versus 7,567, p = 0.002; intervention 7,832 versus 7,739, p = 0.13). Mean compliance with wearing the activity monitor decreased for both groups during phase 2 compared to phase 1 (60% versus 77%, p < 0.001). Mean systolic blood pressure decreased (p = 0.004) and HDL cholesterol increased (p < 0.001) among all participants at end of study compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Although the activity monitor intervention did not have a major impact on activity or health, the high participation rates of busy residents and modest changes in steps, blood pressure, and HDL suggest that more intensive hospital-based wellness programs have potential for promoting healthier lifestyles among physicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01287208.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help