Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effectiveness of an exercise programme on physical function in patients discharged from hospital following critical illness: a randomised controlled trial (the REVIVE trial) [with consumer summary]
McDowell K, O'Neill B, Blackwood B, Clarke C, Gardner E, Johnston P, Kelly M, McCaffrey J, Mullan B, Murphy S, Trinder TJ, Lavery G, McAuley DF, Bradley JM
Thorax 2017 Jul;72(7):594-595
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a 6-week exercise programme in patients discharged home following critical illness compared with standard care. DESIGN: Multicentre prospective phase II randomised controlled trial, with blinded outcome assessment after hospital discharge, following the 6-week intervention and at 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: 60 patients (30 per group) aged > 18 years, mechanically ventilated > 96 hours, and not in other rehabilitation, that is, cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation programmes. Participants in the intervention group completed an individually tailored (personalised) exercise programme. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was SF-36 physical functioning following the intervention. Secondary outcomes included a range of performancebased and patient-reported measures. RESULTS: Improvements in the primary outcome did not differ significantly between groups (mean difference (95% CI) 3.0 (-2.2 to 8.2), p = 0.26). The intervention group showed significant improvement compared with the control group (mean difference (95% CI)) in SF-36 role physical (6.6 (0.73 to 12.5), p = 0.03); incremental shuttle walk test (83.1 m (8.3 to 157.9), p = 0.03); functional limitations profile (-4.8 (-8.7 to -0.9), p = 0.02); self-efficacy to exercise (2.2 (0.8 to 3.7), p = 0.01) and readiness to exercise (1.3 (0.8 to 1.9), p < 0.001). These improvements were not sustained at 6 months except readiness to exercise. Improvements in all other secondary outcome measures were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome measure of selfreported physical function following this 6-week exercise programme. Secondary outcome results will help inform future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01463579 (results).
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help