Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The effects of active video games on patients' rehabilitative outcomes: a meta-analysis [with consumer summary]
Pope Z, Zeng N, Gao Z
Preventive Medicine 2017 Feb;95:38-46
systematic review

A meta-analysis on active video games (AVG) as a rehabilitative tool does not appear to be available. This meta-analytic review synthesizes the effectiveness of AVGs on patients' rehabilitative outcomes. Ninety-eight published studies on AVGs and rehabilitation were obtained in late 2015 with 14 meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) data-based English articles; (2) randomized-controlled trials investigating AVG's effect on rehabilitative outcome(s); and (3) > 1 comparison present in each study. Data extraction for comparisons was completed for three age categories: (1) youth/young adults (5 to 25 years-old); (2) middle-aged adults (40 to 65 years-old); and (3) older adults (> 65 years-old). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software calculated effect size (ES; Hedge's g). Comparison group protocols often employed another non-AVG experimental treatment. Control group protocols implemented standard care. AVGs demonstrated a large positive effect on balance control over control among youth/young adults (ES = 0.81, p < 0.01). Further, AVGs resulted in small positive effects on middle-aged adults' balance control over control (ES = 0.143, p = 0.48) and comparison (ES = 0.14, p = 0.53), with similar results in older adults compared to control (ES = 0.16, p = 0.27). Notably, AVG's effect on balance control versus comparison among older adults was small yet negative (ES = -0.12, p = 0.63). AVGs were also used to enhance general physical functioning (GPF) among middle-aged and older adults. Versus control and comparison, AVGs had no effect on middle-aged adults' GPF (ES = -0.054 and -0.046, respectively) or older adults' GPF (ES = 0.04 and 0.002, respectively). Finally, AVGs had a moderate effect on older adults' falls efficacy versus control (ES = 0.61, p < 0.05). Findings favor AVGs for youth/young adult balance control rehabilitation and falls efficacy promotion in older adults.
Copyright by Academic Press.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help