Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Randomized controlled trial of screening, risk modification, and physical therapy to prevent falls among the elderly recently discharged from the emergency department to the community: the steps to avoid falls in the elderly study
Matchar DB, Duncan PW, Lien CT, Ong MEH, Lee M, Gao F, Sim R, Eom K
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2017 Jun;98(6):1086-1096
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifactorial, tailored program of physical therapy to reduce the occurrence of falls among a heterogeneous group of high-risk elderly Singaporeans recently discharged from the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Communities. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n = 354) aged > 65 years who were seen in the ED for a fall or fall-related injuries and discharged home. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention primarily consisted of a tailored program of physical therapy focused on progressive training in strength, balance, and gait for a period of 3 months. Participants in the intervention group also received screening and follow-up for vision, polypharmacy, and environmental hazards. Participants in the control group received usual care prescribed by a physician and educational materials on falls prevention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was experiencing at least 1 fall during the 9-month study period (a 3-mo active intervention phase and a 6-mo maintenance phase). Secondary outcome measures were the occurrence of at least 1 injurious fall during the study period and a change in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score. Participants were assessed both after 3 and 9 months. RESULTS: During the 9-month study period, 37.8% of the control group and 30.5% of the intervention group fell at least once, which was not statistically significantly different (odds ratio (OR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 1.12; p = 0.146). The intervention group had statistically significantly fewer individuals with injurious falls (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.98; p = 0.041) and less deterioration in physical performance, reflected by a mean difference of 0.6 in SPPB scores (p = 0.029). Multivariate analyses indicated a strong interaction effect between the intervention and the presence of 2 or more major comorbidities; after accounting for this effect, the intervention program reduced the number of people experiencing at least 1 fall (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.67; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that in this heterogeneous population, the proportion of participants experiencing at least 1 fall during the study period was not statistically significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the control group. Secondary analyses strongly suggest that individuals with 2 or more major comorbidities do not benefit from a tailored physical therapy program; however, individuals with less comorbidity may substantially benefit.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help