Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Timing of hypertonic saline and airway clearance techniques in adults with cystic fibrosis during pulmonary exacerbation: pilot data from a randomised crossover study [with consumer summary]
O'Neill K, Moran F, Tunney MM, Elborn JS, Bradbury I, Downey DG, Rendall J, Bradley JM
BMJ Open Respiratory Research 2017 Jan 12;4(1):e000168
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Streamlining the timing of treatments in cystic fibrosis (CF) is important to optimise adherence while ensuring efficacy. The optimal timing of treatment with hypertonic saline (HTS) and airway clearance techniques (ACT) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study hypothesised that HTS before ACT would be more effective than HTS during ACT as measured by Lung Clearance Index (LCI). METHODS: Adults with CF providing written informed consent were randomised to a crossover trial of HTS before ACT or HTS during ACT on consecutive days. ACT treatment consisted of Acapella Duet. Patients completed LCI and spirometry at baseline and 90 min post treatment. Mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs were reported. RESULTS: 13 subjects completed the study (mean (SD) age 33 (12) years, forced expiratory volume in 1 second % (FEV1%) predicted 51% (22), LCI (no. turnovers) 14 (4)). Comparing the two treatments (HTS before ACT versus HTS during ACT), the change from baseline to 90 min post treatment in LCI (MD (95% CI) -0.02 (-0.63 to 0.59)) and FEV1% predicted (MD (95% CI) -0.25 (-2.50 to 1.99)) was not significant. There was no difference in sputum weight (MD (95% CI) -3.0 (-14.9 to 8.9)), patient perceived ease of clearance (MD (95% CI) 0.4 (-0.6 to 1.3) or satisfaction (MD (95% CI) 0.4 (-0.6 to 1.5)). The time taken for HTS during ACT was significantly shorter (MD (95% CI) 14.7 (9.8 to 19.6)). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, HTS before ACT was no more effective than HTS during ACT as measured by LCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01753869; pre-results.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help