Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effectiveness of a fine motor skills rehabilitation program on upper limb disability, manual dexterity, pinch strength, range of fingers motion, performance in activities of daily living, functional independency, and general self-efficacy in hand osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial
Perez-Marmol JM, Garcia-Rios MC, Ortega-Valdivieso MA, Cano-Deltell EE, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Ickmans K, Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME
Journal of Hand Therapy 2017 Jul-Sep;30(3):262-273
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial. INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation treatments for improving fine motor skills (FMS) in hand osteoarthritis (HOA) have not been well explored yet. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To assess the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program on upper limb disability, independence of activities of daily living (ADLs), fine motor abilities, functional independency, and general self-efficacy in older adults with HOA. METHODS: About 45 adults (74 to 86 years) with HOA were assigned to an experimental group for completing an FMS intervention or a control group receiving conventional occupational therapy. Both interventions were performed 3 times/wk, 45 minutes each session, during 8 weeks. Upper limb disability, performance in ADLs, pinch strength, manual dexterity, range of fingers motion, functional independency, and general self-efficacy were assessed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and after 2 months of follow-up. RESULTS: FMS group showed significant improvements with a small effect size on manual dexterity (p <= 0.034; d >= 0.48) and a moderate-high effect on range of index (p <= 0.018; d >= 0.58) and thumb (p <= 0.027; d >= 0.39) motion. The control group showed a significant worse range of motion over time in some joints at the index (p <= 0.037; d >= 0.36) finger and thumb (p <= 0.017; d >= 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: A rehabilitation intervention for FMS may improve manual dexterity and range of fingers motion in HOA, but its effects on upper limb disability, performance in ADLs, pinch strength, functionality, and self-efficacy remain uncertain. Specific interventions of the hand are needed to prevent a worsening in range of finger motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help