Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Intensive early rehabilitation in the intensive care unit for liver transplant recipients: a randomized controlled trial
Maffei P, Wiramus S, Bensoussan L, Bienvenu L, Haddad E, Morange S, Fathallah M, Hardwigsen J, Viton J-M, le Treut YP, Albanese J, Gregoire E
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2017 Aug;98(8):1518-1525
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To validate the feasibility and tolerance of an intensive rehabilitation protocol initiated during the postoperative period in an intensive care unit (ICU) in liver transplant recipients. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: ICU. PARTICIPANTS: Liver transplant recipients over a period of 1 year (n = 40). INTERVENTIONS: The "usual treatment group" (n = 20), which benefited from the usual treatment applied in the ICU (based on physician prescription for the physiotherapist, with one session a day), and the experimental group (n = 20), which followed a protocol of early and intensive rehabilitation (based on a written protocol validated by physicians and an evaluation by physiotherapist, with 2 sessions a day), were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary aims were tolerance, assessed from the number of adverse events during rehabilitation sessions, and feasibility, assessed from the number of sessions discontinued. RESULTS: The results revealed a small percentage of adverse events (1.5% in the usual treatment group versus 1.06% in the experimental group) that were considered to be of low intensity. Patients in the experimental group sat on the edge of their beds sooner (2.6 versus 9.7d; p = 0.048) and their intestinal transit resumed earlier (5.6 versus 3.7d; p = 0.015) than patients in the usual treatment group. There was no significant difference between the 2 arms regarding length of stay (LOS), despite a decrease in duration in the experimental group. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of an intensive early rehabilitation program for liver transplant recipients was well tolerated and feasible in the ICU. We noted that the different activities proposed were introduced sooner in the experimental group. Moreover, there is a tendency to decreased LOS in the ICU for the experimental group. These results now need to be confirmed by studies on a larger scale.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help