Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of interdisciplinary care on weight loss: a randomised controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Tapsell LC, Lonergan M, Batterham MJ, Neale EP, Martin A, Thorne R, Deane F, Peoples G
BMJ Open 2017 Jul;7(7):e014533
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a novel interdisciplinary treatment compared with usual care on weight loss in overweight and obese adult volunteers. DESIGN: Single blinded controlled trial. Participants randomly assigned to usual care (C, general guideline-based diet and exercise advice), intervention (I, interdisciplinary protocol) or intervention plus a healthy food supplement (30 g walnuts/day) (IW). SETTING: Community based study, Illawarra region, south of Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Generally well volunteer adult residents, 25 to 54 years, body mass index (BMI) 25 to 40kg/m2 were eligible. At baseline 439 were assessed, 377 were randomised, 298 completed the 3-month intensive phase and 178 completed the 12-month follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment was provided at clinic visits intensively (0 months, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months) then quarterly to 12 months. Support phone calls were quarterly. All participants underwent blinded assessments for diet, exercise and psychological status. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MEASURES: The primary outcome was difference in weight loss between baseline and 12 months (clinically relevant target 5% loss). Secondary outcomes were changes in blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and lipids, and changes in diet, exercise and psychological parameters. RESULTS: At 12 months, differences in weight loss were identified (p < 0.001). The I group lost more than controls at 3 months (91.11 (92.23 to 90.00), p < 0.05) and the IW more than controls at 3 months (91.25 (92.35 to 90.15), p < 0.05) and 6 months (92.20 (93.90 to 90.49), p < 0.01). The proportion achieving 5% weight loss was significantly different at 3 months, 6 months and 9 months (p = 0.04, p = 0.03, p = 0.03), due to fewer controls on target at 3 months, 6 months and 9 months and more IW participants at 6 months. Reductions in secondary outcomes (systolic blood pressure, blood glucose/lipid parameters and lifestyle measures) followed the pattern of weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary intervention produced greater and more clinically significant and sustained weight loss compared with usual care. The intensive phase was sufficient to reach clinically relevant targets, but long-term management plans may be required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTRN 12614000581662; post-results.
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help