Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The effect of 2 forms of talocrural joint traction on dorsiflexion range of motion and postural control in those with chronic ankle instability
Powden CJ, Hogan KK, Wikstrom EA, Hoch MC
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2017;26(3):239-244
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

CONTEXT: Talocrural joint mobilizations are commonly used to address deficits associated with chronic ankle instability (CAI). OBJECTIVE: Examine the immediate effects of talocrural joint traction in those with CAI. DESIGN: Blinded, crossover. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty adults (14 females; age 23.80 +/- 4.02 y; height 169.55 +/- 12.38 cm; weight 78.34 +/- 16.32 kg) with self-reported CAI participated. Inclusion criteria consisted of a history of >= 1 ankle sprain, >= 2 episodes of giving way in the previous 3 mo, answering "yes" to >= 4 questions on the Ankle Instability Instrument, and <= 24 on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. INTERVENTION: Subjects participated in 3 sessions in which they received a single treatment session of sustained traction (ST), oscillatory traction (OT), or a sham condition in a randomized order. Interventions consisted of four 30-s sets of traction with 1 min of rest between sets. During ST and OT, the talus was distracted distally from the ankle mortise to the end-range of accessory motion. ST consisted of continuous distraction and OT involved 1-s oscillations between the mid and end-range of accessory motion. The sham condition consisted of physical contact without force application. Preintervention and postintervention measurements of weight-bearing dorsiflexion, dynamic balance, and static single-limb balance were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The independent variable was treatment (ST, OT, sham). The dependent variables included pre-to-posttreatment change scores for the WBLT (cm), normalized SEBTAR (%), and time-to-boundary (TTB) variables(s). Separate 1-way ANOVAs examined differences between treatments for each dependent variable. Alpha was set a priori at p < 0.05. RESULTS: No significant treatment effects were identified for any variables. CONCLUSION: A single intervention of ST or OT did not produce significant changes in weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion or postural control in individuals with CAI. Future research should investigate the effects of repeated talocrural traction treatments and the effects of this technique when combined with other manual therapies.
Copyright Human Kinetics. Reprinted with permission from Human Kinetics (Champaign, IL).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help