Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Randomized comparison of helmet CPAP versus high-flow nasal cannula oxygen in pediatric respiratory distress [with consumer summary] | 
| Vitaliti G, Vitaliti MC, Finocchiaro MC, di Stefano VA, Pavone P, Matin N, Motamed-Gorji N, Lubrano R, Falsaperla R | 
| Respiratory Care 2017 Aug;62(8):1036-1042 | 
| clinical trial | 
| 4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* | 
| Copyright release for this abstract has not been granted. 
 |