Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Physical activity and sleep quality in breast cancer survivors: a randomized trial
Rogers LQ, Courneya KS, Oster RA, Anton PM, Robbs RS, Forero A, McAuley E
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2017 Oct;49(10):2009-2015
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: Data from large randomized controlled trials confirming sleep quality improvements with aerobic physical activity have heretofore been lacking for post-primary treatment breast cancer survivors. Our primary purpose for this report was to determine the effects of a physical activity behavior change intervention, previously reported to significantly increase physical activity behavior, on sleep quality in post-primary treatment breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Post-primary treatment breast cancer survivors (n = 222) were randomized to a 3-month physical activity behavior change intervention (Better Exercise Adherence after Treatment for Cancer (BEAT Cancer)) or usual care. Self-report (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)) and actigraphy (latency and efficiency) sleep outcomes were measured at baseline, 3 months (M3), and 6 months (M6). RESULTS: After adjusting for covariates, BEAT Cancer significantly improved PSQI global sleep quality when compared with usual care at M3 (mean between-group difference (M) -1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.1 to -0.7, p < 0.001) and M6 (M -1.0, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.2, p = 0.01). BEAT Cancer improved several PSQI subscales at M3 (sleep quality M -0.3, 95% CI -0.4 to -0.1, p = 0.002; sleep disturbances M -0.2, 95% CI -0.3 to -0.03, p = 0.016; daytime dysfunction M -0.2, 95% CI -0.4 to -0.02, p = 0.027) but not M6. A nonsignificant increase in percent of participants classified as good sleepers occurred. No significant between-group difference was noted for accelerometer latency or efficiency. CONCLUSION: A physical activity intervention significantly reduced perceived global sleep dysfunction at 3 and 6 months, primarily because of improvements in sleep quality aspects not detected with accelerometer.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help