Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of e-bike versus bike commuting on cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight adults: a 4-week randomized pilot study
Hochsmann C, Meister S, Gehrig D, Gordon E, Li Y, Nussbaumer M, Rossmeissl A, Schafer J, Hanssen H, Schmidt-Trucksass A
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 2018 May;28(3):255-265
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To assess if active commuting with an electrically assisted bicycle (e-bike) during a 4-week period can induce increases in cardiorespiratory fitness measured as peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in untrained, overweight individuals, and if these changes are comparable with those induced by a conventional bicycle. DESIGN: Four-week randomized pilot study. SETTING: Controlled laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two volunteers (28 men) participated. Seventeen (median age 37 years (interquartile range (IQR) 34 to 45), median body mass index (BMI) 29 kg/m2 (IQR 27 to 31)) were randomized to the e-bike group and 15 (median age 43 years (IQR 38 to 45), median BMI 28 kg/m2 (IQR 26 to 29)) to the Bike group. INTERVENTIONS: Participants in both groups were instructed to use the bicycle allocated to them (e-bike or conventional bicycle) for an active commute to work in the Basel (Switzerland) area at a self-chosen speed on at least 3 days per week during the 4-week intervention period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: VO2peak was assessed before and after the intervention in an all-out exercise test on a bicycle ergometer. RESULTS: VOpeak increased by an average of 3.6 mL/kg/min (SD 3.6 mL/kg/min) in the e-bike group and by 2.2 mL/kg/min (SD 3.5 mL/kg/min) in the bike group, with an adjusted difference between the 2 groups of 1.4 mL/kg/min (95% confidence interval -1.4 to 4.1; p = 0.327). CONCLUSIONS: E-bikes may have the potential to improve cardiorespiratory fitness similar to conventional bicycles despite the available power assist, as they enable higher biking speeds and greater elevation gain.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.lww.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help