Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of exercise type during intentional weight loss on body composition in older adults with obesity
Beavers KM, Ambrosius WT, Rejeski WJ, Burdette JH, Walkup MP, Sheedy JL, Nesbit BA, Gaukstern JE, Nicklas BJ, Marsh AP
Obesity 2017 Nov;25(11):1823-1829
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term effects of exercise modality during weight loss on body composition and associations between body composition and physical function changes. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine older adults (66.9 +/- 4.7 years, 71% women, 32% African American, BMI 34.4 +/- 3.7 kg/m2) were randomized to weight loss (WL; n = 82), WL plus aerobic training (WL+AT; n = 86), or WL plus resistance training (WL+RT; n = 81) for 18 months. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-acquired body composition, 400-m walk time, and knee extensor strength were measured at baseline and at 6 and 18 months. RESULTS: Total body mass loss was enhanced when WL was combined with exercise (WL -5.7 +/- 0.7 kg, WL+AT -8.5 +/- 0.7 kg, WL+RT -8.7 +/- 0.7 kg; p < 0.01). Total body fat mass loss was significantly greater in WL+AT (-6.8 +/- 0.6 kg, -16.4%) and WL+RT (-7.8 +/- 0.5 kg, -19.0%) than WL (-4.8 +/- 0.6 kg, -10.9%); both p < 0.01. Lean mass loss was greatest in WL+AT (-1.6 +/- 0.3 kg, -3.1%) compared with WL+RT (-0.8 +/- 0.3 kg, -1.5%) or WL (-1.0 +/- 0.3 kg; -2.0%); both p <= 0.02. Change in 400-m walk time was associated with change in fat mass (beta/SD +6.1 s; p < 0.01), while change in knee extensor strength was associated with change in lean mass (beta/SD +1.6Nm; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: WL+RT results in less lean mass lost than WL+AT; WL plus exercise yields greater fat mass loss than WL alone.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help