Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Use of a web-based educational intervention to improve knowledge of healthy diet and lifestyle in women with gestational diabetes mellitus compared to standard clinic-based education
Sayakhot P, Carolan-Olah M, Steele C
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2016 Aug 5;16(208):Epub
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: This study introduced a web-based educational intervention for Australian women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim was to improve knowledge on healthy diet and lifestyle in GDM. Evaluation of the intervention explored women's knowledge and understanding of GDM, healthy diet, healthy food, and healthy lifestyle, after using the web-based program compared to women receiving standard clinic-based GDM education. METHODS: A total of 116 women, aged 18 to 45 years old, newly diagnosed with GDM, participated (intervention n = 56 and control n = 60). Women were randomly allocated to the intervention or control groups and both groups attended a standard GDM education class. Group 1 (intervention) additionally used an online touch screen/computer program. All women completed a questionnaire following the computer program and/or the education class. All questions evaluating levels of knowledge had more than one correct answer and scores were graded from 0 to 1, with each correct component receiving a score, eg, 0.25 per each correct answer in a 4 answer question. Chi-square test was performed to compare the two groups regarding knowledge of GDM. RESULTS: Findings indicated that the majority of women in the intervention group reported correct answers for "types of carbohydrate foods" for pregnant women with GDM, compared to the control group (62.5% versus 58.3%, respectively). Most women in both groups had an excellent understanding of "fruits and vegetables" (98.2% versus 98.3%), and the majority of women in the intervention group understood that they should exercise daily for 30 min, compared to the control group (92.9% versus 91.7%). Both groups had a good understanding across all categories, however, the majority of women in the intervention group scored all correct answers (score = 1) in term of foetal effects (17.9% versus 13.3%, respectively), maternal predictors (5.4% versus 5%), care requirements (39.3% versus 23.3%), GDM perceptions (48.2% versus 46.7%) and GDM treatment (67.9% versus 61.7%), compared to women in the control group. CONCLUSION: The study suggested that both approaches, standard education and standard education plus web-based program, resulted in excellent knowledge scores, but not statistically significant difference between groups. Multiple and immediate access to the web-based education program at home may prove useful as a source of reference for women with GDM. Future study comparing results pre and post intervention is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12615000697583; date registered 3/7/2015; retrospectively registered.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help