Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Safety and prognostic utility of provocative exercise testing in acutely concussed adolescents: a randomized trial |
| Leddy JJ, Hinds AL, Miecznikowski J, Darling S, Matuszak J, Baker JG, Picano J, Willer B |
| Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 2018 Jan;28(1):13-20 |
| clinical trial |
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (1) systematic assessment of exercise tolerance in adolescents shortly after sport-related concussion (SRC) and (2) the prognostic utility of such assessment. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University and community sports medicine centers. PARTICIPANTS: Adolescents with SRC (1 to 9 days from injury). Sixty-five were randomized and 54 completed the study (mean age 15 years, 4 days after injury). INTERVENTIONS: Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT, n = 27) or not (controls, n = 27) on visit day 1. Heart rate threshold (HRt) at symptom exacerbation represented level of exercise tolerance. Participants reported symptoms daily for 14 days and then had follow-up BCTT (n = 54). Recovery was defined as returning to normal level of symptoms and exercise tolerance, verified by independent physician examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Days to recovery and typical (<= 21 days) versus prolonged recovery (> 21 days). Mixed effects linear models and linear regression techniques examined symptom reports and time to recovery. Linear regression assessed the association of HRt with recovery time. RESULTS: Days to recovery (p = 0.7060) and typical versus prolonged recovery (p = 0.1195) were not significantly different between groups. Symptom severity scores decreased in both groups over 14 days (p < 0.0001), were similar (p = 0.2984), and did not significantly increase the day after the BCTT (p = 0.1960). Lower HRt on visit day 1 was strongly associated with prolonged recovery time (p = 0.0032). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic evaluation of exercise tolerance using the BCTT within 1 week after SRC did not affect recovery. The degree of early exercise intolerance after SRC was important for prognosis. This has implications for school academic and team preparation.
|