Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effectiveness of dry needling, manual therapy, and Kinesio Taping methods for patients with chronic myofascial neck pain: a single-blind clinical trial |
Sobhani V, Shamsoddini A, Khatibi-Aghda A, Mazloum V, Kia HH, Emami Meybodi MK |
Trauma Monthly 2017 Nov-Dec;22(6):e39261 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common disorder associated with substantial morbidity. Di erent methods of rehabilitation are used to manage chronic myofascial neck pain. OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to assess the effects of dry needling (DN), manual therapy (MT) and Kinesio Tapingfi (KT) methods on the treatment of patients with chronic myofascial neck pain. METHODS: Thirty-nine individuals (mean +/- standard deviation (SD) age 35 +/- 10.1 years; height 178.6 +/- 7.5 cm; body mass 86.9 +/- 7.7 kg) out of 57 patients (age range 18 to 55 years) were included in the current single-blinded randomized clinical trial. The subjects were assigned into 3 groups (n = 13 subjects in each group) including DN, MT, and KT. Pain intensity, pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), neck disability index (NDI), and cervical spine range of motion (CROM) in di erent directions were evaluated by self-reported questionnaires and cervical goniometer at baseline and following 5 treatment sessions. Following the evaluation of the normal distribution of variables by Shapiro-Wilk test, the paired-samples t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Pain intensity and catasrophizing, neck disability, and CROM in all directions significantly improved following the 3 interventions (p < 0.05). The score changes in CROM for rotation to right and left in MT group were significantly greater than those of the other 2 groups (p < 0.001). Comparisons of changes in scores of other variables between the 3 groups revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is assumed that DN, MT, and KT can improve pain and neck disability and increase CROM in patients with myofascial CNP. The MT techniques are more effective in increasing CROM for rotation compared to the other 2 methods.
|