Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation as an add-on to pulmonary rehabilitation does not provide further benefits in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicenter randomized trial |
Bonnevie T, Gravier F-E, Debeaumont D, Viacroze C, Muir J-F, Cuvelier A, Netchitailo M, Roy AL, Quieffin J, Marques M-H, Medrinal C, Dupuis J, Tardif C |
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2018 Aug;99(8):1462-1470 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional effect of a home-based neuro muscular electrical stimulation (NMES) program as an add-on to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), on functional capacity in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DESIGN: Single-blind, multicenter randomized trial. SETTING: Three PR centers. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with severe to very severe COPD referred for PR (n = 73; median FEV1 1 (0.8 to 1.4) L). Twenty-two subjects discontinued the study but only one drop-out was related to the intervention (leg discomfort). INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomly assigned to either PR plus quadricipital home-based NMES (35 Hz, 30 min, five time per week) or PR without NMES for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The six-minute walk test was used to assess functional capacity. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of the scheduled NMES sessions were performed. In the whole sample, there were significant increases in the distance walked during the 6MWT (p < 0.01), VO2peak (p = 0.02), Wmax (p < 0.01), mMRC (p < 0.01) and SGRQ total score (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of change for any outcome between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based NMES as an add-on to PR did not result in further improvements in subjects with severe to very severe COPD, moreover, it may have been a burden for some patients.
|