Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Poor overall quality of clinical practice guidelines for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review [with consumer summary]
Lin I, Wiles LK, Waller R, Goucke R, Nagree Y, Gibberd M, Straker L, Maher CG, O'Sullivan PPB
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2018 Mar;52(5):337-343
systematic review

OBJECTIVES: Undertake a systematic critical appraisal of contemporary clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for common musculoskeletal (MSK) pain conditions: spinal (lumbar, thoracic and cervical), hip/knee (including osteoarthritis) and shoulder. DESIGN: Systematic review of CPGs (PROSPERO number CRD42016051653). Included CPGs were written in English, developed within the last 5 years, focused on adults and described development processes. Excluded CPGs were for: traumatic MSK pain, single modalities (eg, surgery), traditional healing/medicine, specific disease processes (eg, inflammatory arthropathies) or those that required payment. DATA SOURCES AND METHOD OF APPRAISAL: Four scientific databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Physiotherapy Evidence Database) and four guideline repositories. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was used for critical appraisal. RESULTS: 4,664 records were identified, and 34 CPGs were included. Most were for osteoarthritis (n = 12) or low back pain (n = 11), most commonly from the USA (n = 12). The mean overall AGREE II score was 45% (SD 19.7). Lowest mean domain scores were for applicability (26%, SD 19.5) and editorial independence (33%, SD 27.5). The highest score was for scope and purpose (72%, SD 14.3). Only 8 of 34 CPGS were high quality: for osteoarthritis (n = 4), low back pain (n = 2), neck (n = 1) and shoulder pain (n = 1).
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help