Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of continuous progressive resistance training during hemodialysis on body composition, physical function and quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Rosa CSC, Nishimoto DY, Souza GDE, Ramirez AP, Carletti CO, Daibem CGL, Sakkas GK, Monteiro HL
Clinical Rehabilitation 2018 Jul;32(7):899-908
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of continuous progressive resistance training on body composition, functional capacity and self-reported quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: The study included 52 hemodialysis patients (aged 55.7 +/- 14.03 years) randomized into exercise (progressive resistance training (PRT), n = 28) or control (CON, n = 24) groups. INTERVENTION: Patients randomized into the PRT group received prescribed strength exercises in two sets of 15 to 20 repetitions, in a repetition maximum training zone regime, thrice a week for 12 weeks, during hemodialysis. Patients randomized into the CON group received a sham-exercise with active mobilization of the arms and legs without load and progression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Body composition using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), strength using handgrip dynamometry (HGS), repeated sit-to-stand test (STT), 6-minute walk test, flexibility and the SF-36 questionnaire (quality of life (QoL)) were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Leg lean mass (p = 0.04, effect size (ES) of 0.56), bone mineral content (p = 0.02, ES of 0.65), leg strength in STT repetitions (p = 0.01, ES of 0.66) and flexibility (p < 0.01, ES of 1.03) were significantly improved in the PRT group compared to the CON group. Walking capacity, HGS and QoL were not different between the groups. CONCLUSION: 12 weeks of PRT with a repetition maximum training zone regime provided significant load to increase leg lean mass and STT performance as well as bone mineral content, compared to the CON, which continued to deteriorate. There was lack of efficacy on walking test, HGS and QoL.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help