Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Immediate effect of acupuncture on electromyographic activity of the upper trapezius muscle and pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain: a randomized, single-blinded, sham-controlled, crossover study [with consumer summary] |
| Calamita SAP, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, de Melo NC, Fumagalli MA, Amorim CF, de Paula Gomes CAF, Politti F |
| Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2018 Mar-Apr;41(3):208-217 |
| clinical trial |
| 6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess changes in upper trapezius myoelectric activity and pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain after a single session of acupuncture (ACP). METHODS: A blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted. Fifteen patients with nonspecific neck pain and 15 healthy participants were enrolled in a randomized, single-blinded, crossover study. Each participant was subjected to a single session of ACP and sham acupuncture (SACP). The electromyography (EMG) signal of the upper trapezius muscle was recorded during different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (15% to 30% maximal voluntary contraction) before and after ACP treatment. RESULTS: Significant effects were confirmed after the treatment (ACP and SACP) for numeric rating scale scores (F[1,28] = 51.61; p < 0.0001) and pain area (F[1,2] = 32.03; p < 0.0001). Significant decreases in the EMG amplitude were identified for the nonspecific neck pain group (NPG) (F[1,112] = 26.82; p < 0.0001) and the healthy participant group (HPG) (F[1,112] = 21.69; p < 0.0001) after ACP treatment. No differences were identified between the ACP and SACP treatment protocols for numeric rating scale score (NPG F[1,28] = 0.95; p = 0.33), pain area (NPG F[1,28] = 1.97; p = 0.17), or EMG amplitude (NPG F[1,112] = 0.47; p = 0.49; HPG F[1,112] = 0.75; p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: The effect of ACP at acupoints triple energizer 5 and large intestine 11 triple energizer 5, or in close proximity, contributes to pain relief among patients with nonspecific neck pain. The electromyographic analysis indicated a greater resistance to muscle fatigue and decrease of activity of the upper trapezius muscle among healthy participants and patients with nonspecific neck pain.
|