Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Combination therapy versus exercise and orthotic support in the management of pain in plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial |
| Cinar E, Saxena S, Uygur F |
| Foot & Ankle International 2018 Apr;39(4):406-414 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
BACKGROUND: This study aimed at estimating the effectiveness of two commonly used modalities-extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT)-each combined with usual care (exercises and orthotic supports) in comparison to only usual care to relieve pain in patients with plantar fasciitis (PF). METHODS: Participants with PF were randomly allocated into 3 groups: ESWT (n = 25), LLLT (n = 24), and control (n = 17). All participants received a home exercise program with orthotic support. The ESWT group received 2,000 shock waves with 0.02 mJ/mm2 for 3 sessions, once a week; LLLT group received gallium-aluminum-arsenide laser with 850 nm wavelength for 10 sessions, 3 times a week. Pain was measured by Foot Function Index-pain subscale (FFI-p) and numerical rating scale for pain (NRS-p). The scores were recorded at baseline, third week, and third month after the treatment. Analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in pain over the 3 months in all groups on both FFI-p (p < 0.001) and NRS-p (p < 0.001). In NRS-p, LLLT group had significantly lower pain than ESWT (p = 0.002) at the third week and control (p = 0.043) and ESWT (p = 0.003) at third month. In FFI-p total score, ESWT group had higher pain than LLLT (p = 0.003) and control (p = 0.035) groups at third week and LLLT (p = 0.010) group at third month. CONCLUSION: When LLLT and ESWT were combined with usual care, LLLT was found to be more effective than ESWT in reducing pain in PF at short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, comparative study.
|