Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Maintenance of physical function 1 year after exercise intervention in at-risk older adults: follow-up from the LIFE study
Henderson RM, Miller ME, Fielding RA, Gill TM, Glynn NW, Guralnik JM, King A, Newman AB, Manini TM, Marsh AP, Pahor M, McDermott MM, Rejeski J, Tudor-Locke C, Kritchevsky SB, for the Life Study Investigators
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2018 May;73(5):688-694
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Structured physical activity interventions delay the onset of disability for at-risk older adults. However, it is not known if at-risk older adults continue to participate in physical activity or maintain mobility benefits after cessation of structured intervention. METHODS: One thousand six hundred and thirty-five sedentary men and women aged 70 to 89 years with Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores of 9 or less and able to walk 400 m were randomized to a structured, moderate-intensity physical activity (PA) program consisting of center-based (twice/week) and home-based (three to four times per week) aerobic, resistance, and flexibility training or a health education (HE) program combined with upper extremity stretching. RESULTS: Most of the participants (88% of HE and 87% of PA) returned for a follow-up visit (post) 1 year after cessation of formal intervention. The HE group reported about 1-hour less activity per week than the PA group at end of intervention (last trial; -68.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) -86.5 to -51.3) but similar weekly activity at post (-13.5; 95% CI -29.5 to 2.47). SPPB did not differ between the two groups at last trial (-0.06; 95% CI -0.31 to 0.19) nor POST (-0.18; 95% CI -0.45 to 0.088). CONCLUSIONS: Although sedentary at-risk older adults increased their physical activity during a structured physical activity intervention, they did not continue at this level following the cessation of intervention. Future exercise interventions need to include novel methods to support older adults in continued physical activity following structured interventions.
Copyright the Gerontological Society of America. Reproduced by permission of the publisher.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help