Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Assessing the impact of a novel smartphone application compared with standard follow-up on mobility of patients with knee osteoarthritis following treatment with Hylan G-F 20: a randomized controlled trial
Skrepnik N, Spitzer A, Altman R, Hoekstra J, Stewart J, Toselli R
JMIR MHealth and UHealth 2017 May;5(5):e64
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in the United States. Although no disease-modifying therapies exist, patients with knee OA who increase walking may reduce risk of functional limitations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of a mobile app (OA GO) plus wearable activity monitor/pedometer (Jawbone UP 24) used for 90 days on the mobility of patients with knee OA treated with hylan G-F 20. METHODS: Patients with knee OA aged 30 to 80 years who were eligible to receive hylan G-F 20 and were familiar with smartphone technology were enrolled in this randomized, multicenter, open-label study. Patients who had a body mass index above 35 kg/m2 were excluded. All patients received a single 6-mL injection of hylan G-F 20 and wore the Jawbone monitor. The patients were then randomized 1:1 to Jawbone and OA GO (group A; n = 107) with visible feedback (unblinded) or Jawbone only (group B; n = 104) with no visible feedback (blinded). The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in steps per day at day 90 between groups A and B. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were significant differences between the increases in least squares (LS) mean number of steps per day (1,199 versus 467, p = 0.03) and the mean percentage change (35.8% versus 11.5%, p = 0.02) from baseline in favor of group A over group B. There was a greater reduction in pain from baseline during the 6-minute walk test in group A versus group B. (LS mean change -55.3 versus -33.8, p = 0.007). Most patients (65.4%) and surveys of physicians (67.3%) reported they would be likely or very likely to use/recommend the devices. Patient Activity Measure-13 scores improved from baseline (LS mean change for groups A and B 5.0 versus 6.9), with no significant differences between groups. The occurrence of adverse events was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a novel smartphone app in conjunction with a wearable activity monitor provided additional improvement on mobility parameters such as steps per day and pain with walking in the 6-minute walk test in patients with knee OA who were treated with hylan G-F 20. Results also highlight the amenability of patients and physicians to using mobile health technology in the treatment of OA and suggest further study is warranted.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help