Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Promoting physical activity in high-poverty neighborhood parks: a cluster randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Cohen DA, Han B, Derose KP, Williamson S, Marsh T, Raaen L, McKenzie TL
Social Science & Medicine 2017 Aug;186:130-138
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Although physical activity can help mitigate or prevent multiple chronic diseases, most people in the US, especially high-poverty minority groups, engage in insufficient levels of physical activity. To test ways to promote more physical activity in high-poverty area public parks we conducted a randomized controlled intervention trial. After completing baseline measures of park-based physical activity using systematic direct observation three times/day each month for six months and assessing preferences for park programming among 1,445 residents living within 1 mile of study parks, we randomized 48 parks in high poverty neighborhoods in the City of Los Angeles, California during 2013 to 2014 to four study arms: (1) free physical activity classes over a 6-month period, (2) a frequent user program where participants could win prizes based upon the number of visits they made to the park, (3) both the programs, and (4) neither one (control condition). We re-measured park use in 2014 to 2015 using the same methods during the six months the intervention programs were in operation. A total of 2,047 free park classes were offered attracting 16,718 participants. The frequent user programs enrolled 1,452 individuals and prizes were awarded to 830. Residents in the two study arms with free classes were more likely to report being aware of and participating in park-based physical activity programs; however, overall observed park-based physical activity increased similarly across all study arms. The process evaluation uncovered several barriers to program implementation, including inconsistent scheduling of classes, partly due to safety concerns among instructors. Multiple social factors interfere with leisure time physical activity among low-income populations, suggesting modest interventions may be insufficient to overcome these issues. Although new park programs can attract users, new programs alone may be insufficient to increase overall park use in low-income neighborhoods at times when the programs are not taking place.
With permission from Excerpta Medica Inc.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help