Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Eficacia del entrenamiento muscular respiratorio en el destete de la ventilacion mecanica en pacientes con ventilacion mecanica por 48 o mas horas: un ensayo clinico controlado (Efficacy of respiratory muscle training in weaning of mechanical ventilation in patients with mechanical ventilation for 48 hours or more: a randomized controlled clinical trial) [Spanish]
Sandoval Moreno LM, Casas Quiroga IC, Wilches Luna EC, Garcia AF
Medicina Intensiva 2019 Mar;43(2):79-89
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of respiratory muscular training in the weaning of mechanical ventilation and respiratory muscle strength in patients on mechanical ventilation of 48. hours or more. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial of parallel groups, double-blind. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a IV level clinic in the city of Cali. PATIENTS: 126 patients in mechanical ventilation for 48. hours or more. INTERVENTIONS: The experimental group received daily a respiratory muscle training program with threshold, adjusted to 50% of maximal inspiratory pressure, additional to standard care, conventional received standard care of respiratory physiotherapy. MAIN INTEREST VARIABLES: Weaning of mechanical ventilation. Other variables evaluated: respiratory muscle strength, requirement of non-invasive mechanical ventilation and frequency of reintubation. ANALYSIS: Intention-to-treat analysis was performed with all variables evaluated and analysis stratified by sepsis condition. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the median weaning time of the MV between the groups or in the probability of extubation between groups (HR 0.82 95% CI 0.55 to 1.20, p = 0.29). The maximum inspiratory pressure was increased in the experimental group on average 9.43 (17.48) cmH2O and in the conventional 5.92 (11.90) cmH2O (p = 0.48). The difference between the means of change in maximal inspiratory pressure was 0.46 (p = 0.83, 95%CI -3.85 to -4.78). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory muscle training did not demonstrate efficacy in the reduction of the weaning period of mechanical ventilation nor in the increase of respiratory muscle strength in the study population. Registered study at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02469064).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help