AIM: To determine the benefit provided by physical training programs (aerobic and/or anaerobic) for cystic fibrosis patients. METHOD: A PubMed search was performed in October 2013. Nine articles were selected. Four were used in the present study: 3 level 1-A and 1 level 2-B. RESULTS: For oxygen consumption (V02), aerobic training is more effective than anaerobic training. For muscle power (Wmax) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), anaerobic training is more effective. Quality of life (QoL) is improved by physical training. DISCUSSION: Studies show that both aerobic and anaerobic training improve certain parameters. Data were difficult to collate because of the diversity of parameters in the various studies, but the interpretation of the present results has immediate practical applications. CONCLUSION: Exercise training for cystic fibrosis patients is a good way to combat deterioration of cardio-respiratory and physical functions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PDF locator
• publisher