Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| The effects of inspiratory muscle training on exercise capacity, dyspnea and respiratory functions in lung transplantation candidates: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Pehlivan E, Mutluay F, Balci A, Kilic L |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2018 2018 Oct;32(10):1328-1339 |
| clinical trial |
| 8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether inspiratory muscle training would contribute to the improvement of exercise capacity, dyspnea perception and respiratory functions in lung transplantation candidates. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Pulmonary rehabilitation center. SUBJECTS: A total of 34 patients with severe lung disease requiring lung transplantation were randomly allocated to either pulmonary rehabilitation plus inspiratory muscle training group (PR+IMT group, n = 17) or pulmonary rehabilitation group (PR group, n = 17) before any lung transplantation operation. METHODS: All patients underwent supervised pulmonary rehabilitation program on two days per week for three months. The PR+IMT group received inspiratory muscle training in addition to the standard pulmonary rehabilitation program. The 6-minute walk test, maximal inspiratory pressure, modified Medical Research Concile dyspnea scores and spirometric parameters were measured for each patient. RESULTS: The PR+IMT group had statistically significantly increased in walking distance (100 m, p = 0.03), maximum inspiratory pressure (26 cmH2O, p = 0.001) and alveolar volume ratio of carbonmonoxide diffusion capacity (9%, p = 0.02) than PR group. Although both groups demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the dyspnea score, no significant differences were found between the groups (p = 0.075). There was no change in spirometric variables in both groups. CONCLUSION: A greater increase in exercise capacity was observed in the PR+IMT group. Our study showed that inspiratory muscle training improved exercise capacity even further and increased the benefits provided by pulmonary rehabilitation.
|